Peer Review Draft
April 29, 2008I’ve been out of it for the last few days.
I haven’t noticed the email saying that the discovery-draft needed to be paired together with the progress report though I probably should’ve done that anyways.
I can’t think anymore.
I’m not sure if I even did anything on this paper.
You didn’t really change much the second time around so I’m not going to be able to offer that many more helpful suggestions.
You added an introductory sentence, which is worded good and sets the tone for your critical review. However, I still think it would be best to move the “STORY” section to the top, making it your introduction.
As I said before, this would make it cleared and more understandable for readers.
You didn’t really change anything, so I stand by what I said before. Also, I agree with what Tiffany said above.